3 Nephi 7:15 Textual Variants

Royal Skousen
and it came to pass that Nephi having been visited by angels and also [ 1EFIJLMNOQRT|by ABCDGHKPS] the voice of the Lord therefore having seen angels …

Here we have one more case of disagreement between the printer’s manuscript and the 1830 edition. 𝓟 lacks the repeated preposition by (“having been visited by angels and also the voice of the Lord”) while the 1830 edition has it (“having been visited by angels and also by the voice of the Lord”). As listed under Alma 2:38, there are four cases in the early transmission of the text where the repeated preposition by has been lost, one by the 1830 typesetter and three momentary omissions by Oliver Cowdery in his copywork. There’s also an example of this loss in the 1837 edition as well as one in the 1840 edition. In fact, here in 3 Nephi 7:15 we have a seventh instance where the repeated by has been lost: namely, in the 1849 LDS edition. The copytext for the 1849 edition was the 1841 British edition (which derives directly from the 1837 edition), and that had the repeated by. The subsequent LDS text has continued the reading without the by.

In contrast to the tendency to omit the repeated by, there are no examples in the transmission of the Book of Mormon text where a repeated by has ever been added to a conjunctive prepositional phrase. Thus it seems very unlikely here in 3 Nephi 7:15 that the 1830 reading is the innovative one. Instead, it seems more likely that Oliver Cowdery accidentally omitted the by when he copied the text from 𝓞 into 𝓟. The critical text will therefore restore the repeated by here in 3 Nephi 7:15.

Usually the Book of Mormon text repeats the by in conjunctive prepositional phrases when there is an immediately preceding also:

But in one instance, the by is not repeated after also:

For discussion of this difficult reading, see under that passage. Also see the general discussion under conjunctive repetition in volume 3.

Summary: Restore the repeated by in 3 Nephi 7:15: “having been visited by angels and also by the voice of the Lord”); Oliver Cowdery and the 1849 typesetter both accidentally omitted the repeated by in this passage; the omission of the repeated by has been fairly common in the history of the text.

Analysis of Textual Variants of the Book of Mormon, Part. 5

References