2 Nephi 25:11 Textual Variants

Royal Skousen
and notwithstanding [that >js NULL 1|that A| BCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRST] they have been carried away they shall return again and possess the land of Jerusalem

In the original text of the Book of Mormon, there is some variation with respect to whether notwithstanding should be immediately followed by the subordinate conjunction that whenever a finite clause follows. In most cases (11 out of 13 occurrences involving finite clauses), there is no that in the earliest textual sources:

But in two cases, the original text had the subordinate conjunction that before the finite clause. In addition to the example here in 2 Nephi 25:11, we have this example later on in the text:

In the 1837 edition, these two instances of that following notwithstanding were removed. The first of these (in 2 Nephi 25:11) was marked by Joseph Smith in his editing of 𝓟 for the 1837 edition. The critical text will, of course, restore both these original occurrences of that. For further discussion regarding the optionality of the subordinate conjunction that after adverbial connectors, see under that in volume 3.

Summary: Restore the subordinate conjunction that after notwithstanding in 2 Nephi 25:11 and in 3 Nephi 16:8; when notwithstanding is followed by a finite clause in the Book of Mormon text, the occurrence of that is optional.

Analysis of Textual Variants of the Book of Mormon, Part. 2

References